Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

Login 
  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 232    
     


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 60-64
Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among Malay population


1 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dean Mansarovar Dental College, Kolar Road, Bhopal India and Ex Faculty, School of Dental Sciences, University Sains Malaysia
2 Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dean School of Dental Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia
3 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mansarovar Dental College, Kolar Road, Bhopal, India

Date of Web Publication29-Jun-2012

Correspondence Address:
N Mishra
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mansarovar Dental College, Kolar Road, Bhopal, India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2231-0762.97704

Rights and Permissions

   Abstract 

The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, size, shape, and location of torus palatinus (TP) and torus mandibularis (TM), and to assess their sex-related and age-related differences in the Malay population. Sixty-five subjects were assessed for the presence of both tori at the School of Dental Sciences University Sains Malaysia. The prevalence of TP was 38-63% and that of TM was 1-10%. TP was frequently more common in females than males (90.9% versus 9.1%; P < 0.05) and was frequently found in medium sizes, spindle shaped, and was often located at the combined premolar to molar areas. The prevalence of TM was not significantly different in males and females (33.3% versus 66.7%; P = 0.523), occurred most commonly in bilateral multiple form, and was often located at the canine to premolar area.


Keywords: Torus mandibularis, torus palatinus, prevalence


How to cite this article:
Hiremath V K, Husein A, Mishra N. Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among Malay population. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2011;1:60-4

How to cite this URL:
Hiremath V K, Husein A, Mishra N. Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among Malay population. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2011 [cited 2017 Mar 29];1:60-4. Available from: http://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2011/1/2/60/97704



   Introduction Top


Torus palatinus (TP) and torus mandibularis (TM) are two of the most common intraoral exostoses. Other types of exostoses, affecting the palatal aspect of the maxilla (palatal exostoses) or the buccal aspects of the jaws (buccal exostoses), are less commonly encountered. TP is a sessile nodule of the bone found only in the midline of the hard palate, while TM is a bony protuberance located in the lingual aspect of the mandible, commonly at the canine and premolar areas. [1] Although the tori are not pathologically significant, they may obscure radiographic details of maxillary sinuses and lower premolars. They also interfere with the construction and function of removable dentures, as well as oral function and movement. [1] The prevalence of tori varies widely in different populations, ranging from 0.4% to 66.5% for TP [2] and 0.5% to 63.4% for TM. [2] Racial differences appear significant, with high prevalence in the Asian and Eskimo population. [3] Differences in the prevalence between genders has also been reported. Most authors reported that TP was more frequent in females, while TM affected males more than females. [4] The postulated causes include genetic factors [4] that play a leading role in its occurrence, environmental factors, [5] hyper-function, and continuous growth. The present study was done to determine the prevalence, size, shape, and location of the tori and to investigate the sex and age relation of TP and TM in the Malay population of Malaysians.


   Materials and Methods Top


Our subjects consisted of 65 Malays that included patients from dental outpatient clinic, students, staff, and dental auxiliaries of The School of Dentistry, University Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian Kelantan, Malaysia. The subjects were grouped into six different age groups: 13-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60 years and above. The presence of both tori was examined by clinical inspection and palpation performed by one examiner. Questionable tori were recorded as not present. For the presence of tori, study casts were made using alginate impression material for assessment of the size, shape, and location of the tori. For the size of TP, it was measured at the highest elevation of the outgrowth, using Vernier calipers (OEM,CHINA) with the output to the nearest 0.01 mm. The average size of the tori was graded according to the classification of Reichart et al., [4] as follows: small (<3mm), medium (3-6 mm) and large (>6 mm). The location of TP was classified as premolar, molar, premolar to molar, incisor to premolar, and incisor to molar areas. TM was identified by the number of nodes and their placement, and was divided into four categories: bilateral single, bilateral multiple, unilateral single, and unilateral multiple, as previously described by Kolas et al. [6] Location of TM was recorded as incisor, incisor to canine, incisor to premolar, incisor to molar, incisor and premolar, canine, and canine to premolar. The statistical package for social science (version 11.0) was used for analysis. The Chi-square test was used to test for group differences and sex and age correlation with the prevalence of TP and TM. Difference between groups with P <0.05 was considered significant.


   Results Top


Prevalence

TP and TM were observed in 50.8% and 4.6% respectively, for the total subjects [Table 1] and [Table 2]. We are 95% sure that the prevalence of TP in population will be between 38% and 68%, and the prevalence of TM in population will be between 1% and 10%. TP was found to be significantly higher in females than in males (90.9% versus 9.1%; P < 0.05%), while TM was found to be not significantly different either in males or females (33.3% versus 66.7%; P = 0.523) [Table 3].
Table 1: Distribution of TP in relation to sexes

Click here to view
Table 2: Distribution of TM in relation to sexes

Click here to view
Table 3: The distribution of TP and TM in relation to age and sexes

Click here to view


Size, shape and location of TP

Out of 33 subjects with TP studied, we found that most were medium in size, followed by large in size, and the least was small in size (60.6% for medium in size). The age and sex differences in the distribution pattern of TP according to size were statistically not significantly different (P = 1.000). The age groups of subjects that mostly have medium size of TP were 20-29 years old [Table 4]. [Table 5] shows distribution of TP in relation to age group and shapes. Spindle shape of TP was the most frequently observed, followed by lobular, and the least was nodular. There was a relationship between shape and size of TP (P < 0.05). Most spindle-shaped TP were in medium size, and most of the spindle-shaped TP were in 20-29 years' old age group. [Table 6] shows the distribution of TP in relation to location and age group. The most common location for TP was in the premolar area and the least was in the incisor to molar area. Most TP in the 20-29 years' age group were located in the premolar area. There was an association between age and location of TP (P < 0.05).
Table 4: The distribution of TP in relation to sizes and age groups

Click here to view
Table 5: The distribution of TP in relation to shapes and age groups

Click here to view
Table 6: The distribution of TP in relation to location and age groups

Click here to view


Shape and location of TM

[Table 7] shows the distribution of TM in relation to the number of nodes and placement with age groups. Most TM were bilateral multiple (66.7%) and followed by bilateral single (33.3%). Bilateral multiple TM was found in symmetrical pattern. The most common location of TM was in the canine to premolar area (66.7%) followed by incisor to premolar area (33.3%) [Table 8].
Table 7: The distribution of TM in relation to shapes and age groups

Click here to view
Table 8: The distribution of TM in relation to location and age groups

Click here to view


Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among malay population


   Discussion Top


The results of this study are in agreement with most of the previous studies that TP is more common in females than in males. [3],[5],[6] Other studies also reveal that TM is more common in males than females. [2],[4],[5] This is not in accordance with the results of this study. It can occur in both sexes, not particularly high in males only. Results from a previous study in Thais [1] suggest that the occurrence of TP is a sex-related phenomenon, but not for TM. Haugen [5] stated that there was no obvious explanation for the gender differences but suggests genetics as a responsible factor. According to Alvesalo et al., [7] who studied TM in females with Turner syndrome (45, X), it was suggested that sexual dimorphism in the manifestation of TM might result from the effect of the Y chromosome on the growth, occurrence, expression, and timing of development of TM. Eggen and Natvig [8] reported a similar result in Norwegians and summarized that decreased occurrence of TM among individuals over 50 years of age was related to the number of remaining teeth. Sonier et al. [9] reported that the prevalence of TM was directly related to the presence of teeth. Most of our subjects in the age group of 50 and above were partially edentulous. So it may show that functional influences may be a contributing factor to the occurrence of the tori. Our result shows that the prevalence of tori was mostly in the second decade life, which is in accordance with the previous report of King and Moore [10] stated that, no great differences in the percentage of tor iwhich affected below the age of 30 and assumed that there was little or no further growth of tori after the age of 30. We found that subjects in the 20-29 age group were more likely to have medium size of TP than those in the younger age group. This result supports the association between age and continued growth of tori as reported by Topazian and Mullen. [11] 10 study showed that females had higher frequency of TP and tended to have more medium in size TP than males, which is in accordance with the study in Thais. [1] In a Singaporean study, Chew and Tan [12] reported that 37% of TP present at two thirds of the palate and concluded that the Chinese tended to have large tori. Most of the TP in our study was in the premolar to molar area like the previous study in Thais. [1] Nodular TP was found with the least frequency. Some authors have reported that lobular TP was the rarest type. In the study in Thais, [1] flat TP was found to be the rarest type, and was in contrast with other studies in which this type of TP was predominant. For TM, we observed more bilateral than unilateral, with symmetrical occurrence. These studies are in accordance with most of the studies [1],[4],[5],[6] We also found that most TM were located at the canine to premolar area as in the previous reports. [1] Responding during life to environmental and functional factors that act in a complicated interplay with genetic factors, [5] further studies are also needed to compare the prevalence of tori among races in Malaysia.


   Conclusion Top


The results of this pilot study need to be further studied to support the hypothesis that the occurrence of torus can be considered as a dynamic phenomenon, responding during life to environmental and functional factors that act in a complicated interplay with genetic factors. Further studies are also needed to compare the prevalence of tori among races in Malaysia.

 
   References Top

1.Wandee A, Aree J. Somporn Torus Palatinus and Torus Mandibularis in a Thai population. Sci Asia 2002;105-111.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Hrdlicka A. Mandibular and Maxillary hyperostosis. Am J Anthropol 1940;27:1-67.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Woo JK. Torus Palatinus. Am J Phys Anthropol 1950;8:81-111.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Reichart PA, Neuhaus F, Sookasem M. Prevalence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in Germans and Thai. Community Dent Oral Epidemio 1988;16:61-4.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Haugen LK. Palatine and mandibular tori, A morphologic study in the current Norwegian population. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:65-77.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.Kolas S, Halperin V, Jerreris K, Huddelston S. Robinson HBG the occurrence of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis in 2,478 dental patients. Oral Surg 1953;6:1134-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Alvesalo L, Mayhall JT, Varella J. Torus mandibularis in 45, X females Turners syndrome. Am J Phys Anthropol 1996;101:145-9.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Eggen S, Natvig B. Variations in torus mandibularis prevalence in Norway, a statistical analysis using logistic regression. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19:32-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Sonner KR, Horning GM, Cohen ME. Palatal tubercles, palatal tori and mandibular tori: prevalence and anatomical features in U.S population. J Periodontal 1999;70:329-36.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.King DR, Moore GE. The prevalence pf Torus palatinus. J Oral Med 1971;26:113-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Topazian DS, Mullen FR. Continued growth of a Torus palatinus. J Oral Surg 1977;35:845-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Chew CL, Tan PH. Torus Palatinus A clinical study. Aust Dent J 1984;29;245-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]

This article has been cited by
1 Asymmetric bone remodeling in mandibular and maxillary tori
Jean-Daniel KŘn-Darbois,Bernard Guillaume,Daniel Chappard
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Resolution of Peripheral Obstructive Sleep Apnea From Mandibular Torectomy
Dwight E. McLeod,Sergey B Dolgov,Robert N. Bitter,M. Nathalia Garcia,Elizabeth D. Binz,Mohamed T. Omran
Clinical Advances in Periodontics. 2017; : 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Oral Tori in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients
Pei-Jung Chao,Huang-Yu Yang,Wen-Hung Huang,Cheng-Hao Weng,I-Kuan Wang,Aileen I. Tsai,Tzung-Hai Yen
BioMed Research International. 2015; 2015: 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Oral exostoses: An assessment of two hundred years of research
A. LÚonard,P. Bayle,P. Murail,J. Bruzek
BMSAP. 2014; 26(1-2): 1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Clinical, tomographic aspects and relevance of torus palatinus: case report of two sisters
Alexandre Sim§es Nogueira,Eduardo Sanches Gonšales,Paulo Sergio da Silva Santos,JosÚ Humberto Damante,Phillipe Nogueira Barbosa Alencar,Fernanda Ara˙jo Sampaio,Alexandre Sim§es Garcia
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2013; 35(9): 867
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 
  Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (467 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2438    
    Printed163    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded318    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal