|Year : 2016 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 189-195
|Effect of anodization and alkali-heat treatment on the bioactivity of titanium implant material (an in vitro study)
Ramy A Abdelrahim1, Nadia A Badr2, Kusai Baroudi3
1 Department of Dental Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, Al-Azhar University, Egypt; Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
2 Department of Dental Biomaterials, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
3 Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||04-Jan-2016|
|Date of Acceptance||04-Apr-2016|
|Date of Web Publication||30-May-2016|
Dr. Kusai Baroudi
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, Alfarabi Colleges, P. O. Box: 85184, Riyadh 11691
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Objective: This study was aimed to assess the effect of anodized and alkali-heat surface treatment on the bioactivity of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) after immersion in Hank's solution for 7 days. Materials and Methods: Fifteen titanium alloy samples were used in this study. The samples were divided into three groups (five for each), five samples were anodized in 1M H3PO4at constant voltage value of 20 v and another five samples were alkali-treated in 5 M NaOH solution for 25 min at temperature 60°C followed by heat treatment at 600°C for 1 h. All samples were then immersed in Hank's solution for 7 days to assess the effect of surface modifications on the bioactivity of titanium alloy. The different treated surfaces and control one were characterized by X-ray diffraction, atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Fourier transformation infra-red spectroscopy. Statistical analysis was performed with PASW Statistics 18.0® (Predictive Analytics Software). Results: Anodization of Ti-alloy samples (Group B) led to the formation of bioactive titanium oxide anatase phase and PO43− group on the surface. The alkali-heat treatment of titanium alloy samples (Group C) leads to the formation of bioactive titania hydrogel and supplied sodium ions. The reaction between the Ti sample and NaOH alkaline solution resulted in the formation of a layer of amorphous sodium titania on the Ti surface, and this layer can induce apatite deposition. Conclusions: The surface roughness and surface chemistry had an excellent ability to induce bioactivity of titanium alloy. The anodization in H3PO4produced anatase titanium oxide on the surface with phosphate originated from electrolytes changed the surface topography and allowed formation of calcium-phosphate.
Keywords: Alkali-heat treatment, anodization, bioactivity, surface roughness
|How to cite this article:|
Abdelrahim RA, Badr NA, Baroudi K. Effect of anodization and alkali-heat treatment on the bioactivity of titanium implant material (an in vitro study). J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2016;6:189-95
|How to cite this URL:|
Abdelrahim RA, Badr NA, Baroudi K. Effect of anodization and alkali-heat treatment on the bioactivity of titanium implant material (an in vitro study). J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Jul 6];6:189-95. Available from: https://www.jispcd.org/text.asp?2016/6/3/189/183107
| Introduction|| |
Titanium and its alloys widely used as implant biomaterials because of their relatively superior physical properties such as lower modulus, low density, and relatively low elastic modulus and because of their superior biocompatibility due to their excellent corrosion resistance, and bioinertness of the oxide layer., Therefore, titanium (Ti) and its alloys mainly (Ti-6Al-4V) became the most suitable metal for endosseous implants fabrication.,
One of the most serious and prevalent mechanisms, for obtaining biofunctional and biocompatible material for biomedical use, is surface modification. The surface modification technique is a process that changes the material surface through changes in their chemical composition, structure, and morphology, but the bulk mechanical properties of the material not affected.,
The surface of a biomaterial plays a key role in determining biocompatibility., Therefore, biomaterials surface in contact with the biological tissue or fluid is named “biointerface.” The biointerface is the place where the modifications are commonly carried out to make biomaterials more compatible, and these modifications are fall under three categories, namely, morphologic, physicochemical, and biological. Surface of biomaterials represents a crucial value for biomedical field and determine biocompatibility of the biomaterial because only the uppermost molecular layers are in intimate contact with the biological environment. Thus, any interaction between the implant materials and the biological environment occurs at or through the level of narrow zone termed as the interface. Therefore, the biomaterial scientists have a special concern with the interfacial chemistry that determined by the uppermost few nanometers that composed the materials surface.
For an optimally bonding between the implant material and living bone in the human body, it is essential that the implant can form bone-like apatite layer on its surface. The nucleation of apatite on the surface of a material is induced by the functional groups on its surface., The surface modification of titanium implants is an interested issue for investigation aiming to induce acceleration of normal bone healing allowing immediate loading of the implant.,
The treatment of titanium surfaces by alkaline solution followed by heat treatment was described by some investigators,,,, who successfully proved the bioactive induction both in vitro and in vivo. Hydroxyapatite formation onto Ti surface can be accelerated by treatment titanium surface by NaOH solution followed by heat treatment to produce layer of sodium titanate on titanium surface. Titanium surface that treated with alkaline solution followed heat treatment is thought to bond to living bone via formation of apatite layer on its surface while the titanium surface that treated with alkaline solution only did not., Recently, in vitro studies showed that bone-like apatite could be formed on the titanium surface that treated with alkaline followed by heat treatment when immersed in simulating body fluid (SBF) via formation of titana hydrogel on titanium surface.,
Among surface treatments, the anodizing exhibited effectiveness in modifying surface properties of metals, particularly in inducing the bioactivity of titanium. Anodic oxidation of titanium implants involved several changes in oxide characteristic increases not only the thickness of native oxide layer but also the surface texture such as the ability of fabricating porous Ti oxide films, the changeability of the crystalline structure, chemical composition of oxide film, and through formation of rough and homogeneous TiO2 layer with numerous nanoscale pores. The surface modification of titanium implants by anodic oxidation in phosphoric/sulfuric acid electrolyte systems showed an increase in oxide thickness, which significantly improves the bone response for better osseointegration between Ti surface and surrounding bone.
This study aimed to investigate the effect of different surface treatment on the bioactivity of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) and their ability to form calcium phosphate apatite crystals on their surfaces after immersion in a simulated body fluid.
| Materials and Methods|| |
This study was performed in the Department of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Al-Azhar University. Ethical approval of Al-Azhar University was taken (under number 207/2009).
A total of fifteen samples made of Ti-6Al-4V alloy (extra low interstitials F 130–84 alloy, USA) were used in this study. The sample dimensions were rectangular in shape of 15 mm in length, 7 mm in width, and 2 mm in thickness. The titanium samples were silky polished using sandpaper starting from gravel #400 to #1200, and then ultrasonically cleaned in deionized water for 5 min before dried by air dryer.
Then, the samples were classified into three groups according to the following treatments: Five sample each, according to the received surface treatment. The surface treatment involved anodization (Group B) and alkali-heat treatment (Group C). Five samples were kept untreated and served as control (Group A). Ten samples of Groups B and C were etched in acid blend of 80 ml/l HNO3, 60 ml/l HF, and 150 ml/l H2O2 for 5 min at room temperature before the surface treatment.
Five samples were subjected to anodization process, Group B, after acid etching to form an oxide porous film on their surfaces. The anodizing processes were performed in electrochemical cell that has an anodizing solution as electrolyte and two electrodes using a direct current source with value of 20 v as constant voltage. A cathode of platinum is connected to the negative terminal of a voltage source and placed in the solution, and Ti-alloy sample is connected to the positive terminal of the voltage source and also place in the solution as anode with about 4 cm as a fixed distance between cathode and anode. An electrolyte bath consists of 98 g/L (1 M H3 PO4) aqueous solution (1 L total volume) having pH 1.5 that was stirred with magnetic stirrer with 180 rpm. The anodizing process was carried out at room temperature for 15 min, and then the samples were ultrasonically cleaned for 5 min in deionized water.
The samples of Group C were alkali-treated by immersion in 5 M NaOH solution for 25 min at temperature 60°C and washed with distilled water, and dried in the air. Then, the samples were heat treated at 600°C for 1 h in a furnace at heating rate 30°C/min. Then, they gradually cooled to room temperature.
The surfaces of each group were characterized after surface treatment using X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Philips Analytical X-ray B.V.), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Technics Inc., JEOL JSM 5410, Japan production), and atomic force microscopy (Thermomicroscopes Autoprobe CP research, scanner 100 m, USA).
Before immersion in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS), the samples were rinsed with distilled water, washed further with ethanol in an ultrasonic bath for 20 min, and then dried in air. All the investigated samples were immersed for 7 days in the HBSS which was used as SBF at pH 7.4 and 37°C. HBSS was renewed every 3 days to maintain the level of ion concentration allowing for biomimetic coat precipitation on the sample surfaces. After the immersion of the Ti-alloy samples in HBSS, the specimens were removed from the solution, gently rinsed with distilled water and then dried at 60°C for 24 h.
To assess the biomimetic coat on the differently treated samples, microstructural/morphological changes of the specimens' surfaces were characterized. Meanwhile, the surface morphology was examined using SEM. Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) (Model: Link ISIS-OXFORD – England. The device is attached to JEOL-5400 Scanning Microscope) assembled on the SEM was used to determine the atomic % of calcium, phosphorous elements, and Ca/P ratio of the precipitation. Fourier transformation infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR) (FT/6300 Type A. Jasco, Japan) was used to analyze qualitatively the chemical structure of biomimetic coat which precipitated on the immersed surface.
Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test at the significance level of α = 0.05.
| Results|| |
The XRD analysis of the anodized group revealed the presence of anatase TiO2 phase while the alkali-heat-treated group reveals the presence of rutile TiO2 and Ti-OH phases as shown in [Figure 1].
Atomic Force Micrograph of the alkali-heat treated group shows the highest surface roughness among the all investigated group with multiple deep valises in three-dimensional (3D) image, followed by the anodized group, which shows severe undulation of the surface; however, no sharp peaks were evident in the 3D images and the least surface roughness was the control group, and its 3D image shows slight irregularities and serration of the metal surface due to polishing as shown in [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Atomic force micrographs of Group A, B, and C (three-dimensional)|
Click here to view
The statistical analysis of the surface roughness of the different surface treated groups is shown in [Figure 3]. ANOVA test showed that there was a statistically significant difference among mean (Ra) values of the investigated groups with P < 0.05. Pair-wise comparisons among the groups revealed that alkali-heat-treated group showed the highest statistically significantly mean (Ra) value.
|Figure 3: Mean values of surface roughness (Ra) of the investigated groups|
Click here to view
The scanning electron micrograph of the control group showed that polishing marks of Ti-alloy obviously seen on the sample surface, and the anodized group revealed presence of numerous and unattached, well-defined, nano-sized pores while the alkali-heat-treated group revealed the presence of numerous, unattached, well-defined, nano-sized pores that arranged in an ordered pattern and equally distributed all over the structure on the surface spread among micro-sized particles. It was prominent that the pores are deeper with darker contrast [Figure 4].
|Figure 4: Scanning electron micrographs of Group A, B, and C before and after immersion in Hank's solution|
Click here to view
After immersion in Hank's solution, the SEM showed discrete small apatite crystals formed on the surface of the control samples and the EDXA spectrum showed phosphorus atomic% of 53.94 and calcium atomic% of 46.05 and Ca/P ratio of 0.85, which is much lower than stoichiometric value of hydroxyapatite (1.67). It indicates the synthesis of mono-calcium phosphate monohydrate of chemical composition of Ca (H2 PO4)2.H2O and/or dicalcium phosphate dehydrate (brushite) Ca HPO4.2H2O [Figure 4-II] and [Figure 5].
|Figure 5: Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum of group A, B and C after immersion in Hank's solution|
Click here to view
The SEM of the anodized group showed contiguous layer of apatite nuclei formed on the surface of the anodized samples such that the substrate is not obviously seen and EDXA spectrum showed phosphorus atomic% of 43.72 and calcium atomic% of 56.28 and Ca/P ratio of 1.28, which is less than stoichiometric value of hydroxyapatite (1.67). This ratio indicates the synthesis of octacalcium phosphate of chemical composition Ca8(HPO4)2(PO4)4·5H2O [Figure 4-II] and [Figure 5].
While the SEM of the alkali-heat-treated group exhibited layer composed of an interconnected spherical particle, this layer is to some extent thicker, and the particles are larger in size. The EDXA spectrum showed phosphorus atomic% of 37.96 and calcium atomic% of 62.04 and Ca/P ratio of 1.67. This ratio suggests the formation of calcium deficient hydroxyapatite or occasionally named precipitated HA of chemical formula CaxHy(PO4)z.nH2O [Figure 4-II] and [Figure 5].
The FTIR analysis of control group, Group A, is shown in [Figure 6]. The spectrum revealed that the presence of vibration band at 606 cm −1 is for symmetric stretching vibration of PO43− (υ4). The bands at 865 and 985 cm −1 are bands for symmetric stretching vibration of PO43− (υ1) while band at 1019 cm −1 for asymmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3). The symmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3) are represented by bands at 1058 and 1090 cm −1 while the band at 1075 cm −1 is absent. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of HPO42− group are observed at 1113, 1141 and 1226 cm −1. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of CO32− are captured at 873, 1414, and 1453 cm −1. The reflectance bands characteristic for H2O were observed at 625, 3083, 3249, 3333, and 3546 cm −1 which denoting OH − group of HA. The carbonyl group C=O is identified from bands at 1698 and 1712 cm −1.
|Figure 6: Fourier transformation infra-red spectroscopy spectra of investigated Groups A, B, and C after immersion in Hank's solution|
Click here to view
The FTIR analysis of anodized samples, Group B, is shown in [Figure 6]. The spectrum revealed that the presence of vibration bands at 563 and at 604 cm −1 is for symmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ4). The bands at 862 and 965 cm −1 are bands for symmetric stretching vibration of PO43− (υ1) while band at 1020 cm −1 is for asymmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3). The symmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3) are represented by band 1076 cm −1 while the band at 1047 and at 1096 is absent. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of HPO42− group are observed at 1114, 1143, and 1222 cm −1. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of CO32− are captured at 875, 1416, and 1455 cm −1. The reflectance bands characteristic for H2O are observed at 629 and 3230 cm −1 which denoting OH − group of HA. A broad and not very intense band in HAp at 3230 cm −1 may be due to the presence of lattice water in the solid or it caused by the H-bonding between the adsorbed H2O and the OH group of the apatite. The carbonyl group C=O is identified from bands at 1693 and 1760 cm −1.
The FTIR analysis of alkali-heat-treated samples, Group C, is shown in [Figure 6]. The spectrum revealed that the presence of vibration bands at 561 and at 602 cm −1 is for symmetric stretching vibration of PO43− (υ4) while bands at 871, 960, and 985 cm −1 are characteristic bands for symmetric stretching vibration of PO43− (υ1) while band at 1019 cm −1 is characteristic for asymmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3). The symmetric stretching vibrations of PO43− (υ3) are represented by band 1093 cm −1 while the band at 1048 and 1075 cm −1 is absent. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of HPO42− group are observed at 1111 and 1220 cm −1. The symmetric stretching vibration bands of CO32− are captured at 1416 and 1455 cm −1. The reflectance bands characteristic for H2O were observed at 626, 3001, 3195, and 3550 cm -1 which denoting OH − group of HA. The carbonyl Group C=O is identified from bands at 1712, 1726 cm −1.
| Discussion|| |
The anodization in H3 PO4 produced anatase titanium oxide on the surface with phosphate originated from electrolytes and changed the surface topography., In addition, crystal structures of titanium oxide found on titanium surface after anodization , allowed formation of calcium-phosphate in Hank's solution with ion concentrations approximating those of human blood plasma.
It is reported that in aqueous body fluid, the OH − bonds easily to the Ti 4+ of TiO2 and subsequently Ti-OH groups is formed. The isoelectric point of titanium oxide surface at electrolyte pH nearly 5–6 shows zero net charge. A positively charged surface will be created by production of (Ti-OH2)+ in the surface layer at electrolyte pH <5. The Ti-OH will be deprotonated at electrolyte pH >6, and becomes (Ti-OH)− so the surface will be a negatively charged. Therefore, the surface will be negatively charged at the physiological pH of ~7.4, due to the existence of deprotonated acidic hydroxides. That negatively charged surface can attract cations such as calcium that subsequently could react with HPO42− or H2 PO4− to form calcium phosphates.
The titanium cations can react with phosphoric acid to form phosphates as explained in the following reactions:
In turn, the nucleation of calcium phosphate nanocrystals within nanopores could be facilitated by the presence of these phosphate ions.
The reaction between the Ti sample and NaOH alkaline solution will lead to the formation of a layer of amorphous sodium titania on the Ti surface. Alkaline treatment for 25 min would provide a titania layer of considerable thickness with mature submicrometer porosity. Further, heat treatment at temperature (600°C) for extended time (1 h) resulted in a cracked layer with an increased thickness. The thickness and gradual transformation of the titania layer from an amorphous to a crystalline state depended almost linearly on the period and the temperature of the chemical treatment.
This layer can induce apatite deposition in SBF by a mechanism was proposed by Cui and Kim 2008. Their elucidation based on the reaction of Na + ions from sodium titanate layer, with H3O + ions forming Ti-OH groups on the surface. Those Ti-OH groups on the titanium surface are essential for the formation of calcium phosphates. These negatively charged Ti-OH groups react with positively charged Ca 2+ ions from the SBF and form calcium titanate, which acts as nucleation sites for apatite crystal formation. Therefore, the more Ti-OH groups, the more would be the ability to induce apatite nucleation. On accumulation of Ca 2+ ions, the calcium titanate changed to be positively charged and combined with negatively charged phosphate to form calcium phosphates and then transform to apatite.
The difference between the surface activities of chemically and electrochemically treated Ti-6Al-4V is due to the different surface morphology and structure, i.e., increased surface roughness lead to increased bioactivity.,
Although this research was carefully prepared, I am still aware of its limitations and shortcomings.
First of all, the research was concerned only with in vitro and have not any in vivo study.
Second, the study did not cover different surface modification methods.
Third, the study was done using titanium alloy discs and not titanium implants.
| Conclusions|| |
Electrochemical treatment of anodic oxidation in H3 PO4 solution converted titanium oxide to the favorable anatase phase and provided PO43− which acted as nuclei for developing HA crystals. Immersion in NaOH solution before alkali-heat treatment of titanium alloy supplied sodium ions and titania hydrogel which are beneficial substrate to precipitate calcium and phosphorus in a ratio comparable to that of stoichiometric HA.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Liu X, Chu PK, Ding C. Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng 2004;47:49-121.
Wally ZJ, Grunsven WV, Claeyssens F, Goodall R, Reilly GC. Porous titanium for dental implant applications (Review Article). Metals 2015;5:1902-20.
Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993;43:245-53.
Özcan M, Hämmerle C. Titanium as a reconstruction and implant material in dentistry: Advantages and pitfalls. Materials 2012;5:1528-45.
Hanawa T. An overview of biofunctionalization of metals in Japan. Soc Interface J 2009;6:S361-9.
Jemat A, Ghazali MJ, Razali M, Otsuka Y. Surface modifications and their effects on titanium dental implants (Review Article). Bio Med Res Int 2015;10:1155-66.
Hallab NJ, Bundy KJ, O'Connor K, Moses RL, Jacobs JJ. Evaluation of metallic and polymeric biomaterial surface energy and surface roughness characteristics for directed cell adhesion. Tissue Eng 2001;7:55-71.
Seon GM, Seo HJ, Kwon SY, Lee MH, Kwon BJ, Kim MS, et al.
Titanium surface modification by using microwave-induced argon plasma in various conditions to enhance osteoblast biocompatibility. Biomater Res 2015;19:13.
Rao KS, Panda AK, Labhasetwar V. Intravascular drug delivery systems and devices: Interactions at biointerface. Surf Interface Biomater 2005;(2005):573-83.
Vogler EA. Interfacial chemistry in biomaterials science, in wettability. Surfactant Sci Ser 1993;49:184-250.
Uchida M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Nakamura T. Bonelike apatite formation induced on zirconia gel in a simulated body fluid and its modified solutions. J Am Ceram Soc 2001;84:2041-4.
Kurella A, Dahotre NB. Review paper: Surface modifi cation for bioimplants: The role of laser surface engineering. J Biomater Appl 2015;29(7):915-28.
Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:409-17.
Kokubo T, Yamaguchi S. Bioactive titanate layers formed on titanium and its alloys by simple chemical and heat treatments. Open Biomed Eng J 2015;9:29-41.
Liang FH, Zhou L, Wang KG. Influence of heat treatment on the in vitro
bioactivity of alkali-treated titanium surfaces. Surf Coat Technol 2003;165:133-39.
Bsat S, Yavari SA, Munsch M, Valstar ER, Zadpoor AA. Effect of alkali-acid-heat chemical surface treatment on electron beam melted porous titanium and its apatite forming ability. Materials 2015;8:1612-25.
Xing H, Komasa S, Taguchi Y, Sekino T, Okazaki J. Osteogenic activity of titanium surfaces with nanonetwork structures. Int J Nanomedicine 2014;9:1741-55.
So K, Kaneuji A, Matsumoto T, Matsuda S, Akiyama H. Is the bone-bonding ability of a cementless total hip prosthesis enhanced by alkaline and heat treatments? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013;471:3847-55.
Kim K, Lee BA, Piao XH, Chung HJ, Kim YJ. Surface characteristics and bioactivity of an anodized titanium surface. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2013;43:198-205.
Krasicka-Cydzik E. Gel-like layer development during formation of thin anodic films on titanium in phosphoric acid solutions. Corros Sci 2004;46:2487-502.
Kim MH, Park K, Choi KH, Kim SH, Kim SE, Jeong CM, et al.
Cell adhesion and in vivo
osseointegration of sandblasted/acid etched/anodized dental implants. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16:10324-36.
Chrzanowski W. Corrosion study of Ti6Al7Nb alloy after thermal, anodic and alkali surface treatments. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 2008;31:2-6.
Shabani M, Zamiri R, Goodarzi M. Study on the surface modification of titanium alloy by nanostructure TiO2
grown through anodic oxidation treatment. Austin Chem Eng 2015;2:1015-20.
Kim KH, Ramaswamy N. Electrochemical surface modification of titanium in dentistry. Dent Mater J 2009;28:20-36.
Sanchez AG, Schreiner W, Duffó G, Ceré S. Surface modification of titanium by anodic oxidation in phosphoric acid at low potentials. Part 1. Structure, electronic properties and thickness of the anodic films. Surf Interface Anal 2013;45:1036-47.
Gugelmina BS, Santosa LS, Ponte HA, Marinoc CE. Electrochemical stability and bioactivity evaluation of Ti6Al4V surface coated with thin oxide by EIS for biomedical applications. Mater Res 2015;18:602-7.
Ma QQ, Li MH, Hu ZY, Chen Q, Hu WY. Enhancement of the bioactivity of titanium oxide nanotubes by precalcification. J Mater Lett 2008;62:3035-8.
Rohanizadeh R, Al-Sadeq M, Legeros RZ. Preparation of different forms of titanium oxide on titanium surface: Effects on apatite deposition. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;71:343-52.
Kunze J, Müller L, Macak JM, Greil P, Schmuki P, Müller FA. Time-dependent growth of biomimetic apatite on anodic TiO2
nanotubes. Electrochim. J Acta Mater 2008;53:6995-7003.
Dorozhkin SV, Epple M. Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2002;41:3130-46.
Wei M, Kim HM, Kokubo T, Evans JH. Optimising the bioactivity of alkaline treated titanium alloy. Mater Sci Eng Coat 2002;20:125-34.
Cui X, Kim HM, Kawashita M, Wang L, Xiong T, Kokubo T, et al.
Effect of hot water and heat treatment on the apatite-forming ability of titania films formed on titanium metal via anodic oxidation in acetic acid solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:1767-73.
Thirugnanam A, Kumar TS, Chakkingal U. Bioactivity enhancement of commercial pure titanium by chemical treatments. Trends Biomater Artif Organs 2009;22:202-10.
Lindahl C, Engqvist H, Xia W. Influence of surface treatments on the bioactivity of Ti. ISRN Biomater 2013;(2013):19-28.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
|This article has been cited by|
||Biocompatible Coating on Micro-structured Titanium Implants with Enhanced Osteogenesis to Facilitate Bone-implant Integration
| ||Jiannan Wu, Jing Yang, Yanying Wang, Yanduo Wang, Haiyang Yu, Jing Han, Jian Zhang |
| ||ChemistrySelect. 2022; 7(12) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Anatase Forming Treatment without Surface Morphological Alteration of Dental Implant
| ||Saturnino Marco Lupi,Benedetta Albini,Arianna Rodriguez y Baena,Giulia Lanfrè,Pietro Galinetto |
| ||Materials. 2020; 13(22): 5280 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Improvements on biological and antimicrobial properties of titanium modified by AgNPs-loaded chitosan-heparin polyelectrolyte multilayers
| ||Wen Li,Yanwei Yang,Hongchen Zhang,Zexian Xu,Libo Zhao,Jinqing Wang,Yinong Qiu,Bin Liu |
| ||Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2019; 30(5) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Comparison with the osteoconductivity and bone-bonding ability of the iodine supported titanium, titanium with porous oxide layer and the titanium alloy in the rabbit model
| ||Tadashi Taga,Tamon Kabata,Yoshitomo Kajino,Daisuke Inoue,Takaaki Ohmori,Takashi Yamamoto,Tomoharu Takagi,Hiroyuki Tsuchiya |
| ||Journal of Orthopaedic Science. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Effect of friction hardening pre-treatment on increasing cytocompatibility of alkali heat-treated Ti-6Al-4V alloy
| ||F. Shahriyari,A. Razaghian,R. Taghiabadi,A. Peirovi,A. Amini |
| ||Surface and Coatings Technology. 2018; 353: 148 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Transformation of the surface compositions of titanium during alkali and heat treatment at different vacuum degrees
| ||Ning-bo Li,Gui-yong Xiao,I-Hsien Tsai,Jun-han Zhao,Xin Chen,Wen-hua Xu,Yu-peng Lu |
| ||New Journal of Chemistry. 2018; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Evaluation of the Surrounding Ring of Two Different Extra-Short Implant Designs in Crestal Bone Maintanence: A Histologic Study in Dogs
| ||José Calvo-Guirado,Hilde Morales-Meléndez,Carlos Pérez-Albacete Martínez,David Morales-Schwarz,Roni Kolerman,Manuel Fernández-Domínguez,Sérgio Gehrke,José Maté-Sánchez de Val |
| ||Materials. 2018; 11(9): 1630 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||3491 |
| Printed||75 |
| Emailed||0 |
| PDF Downloaded||272 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||7 |