Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 608    
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 141-147

A survey of oral health in institutionalized population with intellectual disabilities: Comparison with a national oral health survey of the normal population

1 Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
2 Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
3 Forensic Dentistry and Human Identification, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

Correspondence Address:
Hicham A Diab
Department of Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Lebanese University, Beirut
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_65_17

Rights and Permissions

Introduction: Compared to the general population, the intellectually-disabled (ID) experience poor health and inferior access to high quality health services. Aim: To compare the oral health of institutionalized ID Lebanese individuals to that of the normal Lebanese population (NLP). Materials and Methods: Caries and periodontal indices were recorded in 652 ID individuals (aged 6, 12, 15, and 35-44 years) residing in the 5 major Lebanese governorates. The comparison population was derived from the National Oral Health Survey conducted in 1994. Results: Six-year-old ID children had an average of 3.28 decayed primary teeth, 0.22 filled primary teeth, and an overall dft score of 3.50, whereas in the general population decayed, filled, and overall dft scores were 4.90, 0.10, and 5.4, respectively. The lowest number of permanent decayed teeth in the ID was recorded in the 35-44-year-old group (3.17) and the highest in 15-year-old group (4.01). In the NLP, the number of decayed permanent teeth gradually increased from age 12 (5.14) to age 35-44 years (7.20). Caries indices were generally better in the ID than that in the NLP, except for more missing teeth in ID adults (6.24 compared to 4.98). The ID population presented with more severe periodontal disease (pocketing) whereas the NLP presented with a greater proportion with calculus. Conclusion: This study highlighted important differences in oral health and treatment needs in the ID compared than that of the NLP. Policy changes are required if adequate services are to be provided for this group of the population.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded220    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal