ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2022 | Volume
: 12
| Issue : 2 | Page : 216-225 |
|
Effect of fluoride recharge on the microleakage of fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy study
Snigdha Gavini1, Srihari Devalla1, Pushpa Shankarappa1, M Padmaja1, Rishitha Tiriveedi1, J Ramakrishna2
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India 2 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, St. Joseph Dental College, Eluru, Andhra Pradesh, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Snigdha Gavini Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, St. Joseph Dental College, Duggirala, Eluru 534003, Andhra Pradesh. India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_283_21
|
|
Context: Success or failure of a restoration depends on its ability to bond to the tooth structure, to reduce microleakage, and to inhibit secondary caries. Fluoride-releasing materials have the inherent potential to release fluoride and are also capable of recharging themselves with topical agents. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the effect of fluoride recharge on microleakage of different restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Eighty extracted teeth were collected and split mesiodistally into 160 specimens. Class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces. Specimens were divided into four groups of 40 each based on the restorative material. Group I: Glass ionomer; Group II: Resin composite; Group III: Giomer; and Group IV: Alkasite. The restored teeth were stored in artificial saliva. Each group was divided into four subgroups for fluoride recharge and subsequent confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) examination: (A) no fluoride recharge and CLSM examination after 24 h, (B) no fluoride recharge and CLSM examination after 3 weeks, (C) fluoride recharge once at third week followed by CLSM examination at 6 weeks, and (D) fluoride recharge twice at third week and sixth week followed by CLSM examination at 9 weeks. Statistical Analysis: Kruskal−Wallis and Mann−Whitney U tests were performed to analyze the obtained data. Results: A significant difference in microleakage was noted among resin composite and other groups except Cention-N, whereas no significant difference was noted pre- and post-fluoride recharge. Conclusion: Increased microleakage was noted post-fluoride recharge, although statistically not significant. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|