Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current issue | Archives | Submit article | Instructions| Reviewers

  Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size Users Online: 216    

    Article Cited by others


Comparison of digital and conventional impression methods by preclinical students: Efficiency and future expectations

Bilir Halenur, Ayguzen Ceren

Year : 2020| Volume: 10| Issue : 4 | Page no: 402-409

   This article has been cited by
1 Self-assessment on evaluating a crown preparation utilizing digital dental technology versus conventional direct supervision
Mary Kang, Jong Kil Kim, Anna Wong, Monica Bebawy, Denise Estafan
Clinical Dentistry Reviewed. 2021; 5(1)
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Dental students’ preference and perception on intraoral scanning and impression making
Walter Yu-Hang Lam,Ken Chung-Kan Mak,Ebrahim Maghami,Pedro Molinero-Mourelle
BMC Medical Education. 2021; 21(1)
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 CADCAM in dentistry. Materials and methods: an overview for the dental team
Simon Fieldhouse
Dental Update. 2021; 48(8): 671
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Comparative Assessment of Precision of Prepared Single Tooth using Shining 3D Intraoral Scanner and Conventional Impressions Made using Polyvinyl Siloxane and Polyether Impression Material – An In vitro Study
Divya Rajesh Mehta,Palak Abhishek Pandya,Siddhant Kulmendra Taneja,Vyoma Sanjaybhai Sheth,Shlesha Ketankumar Patel,Anuj Vasantray Mansata
Journal of Research and Advancement in Dentistry. 2021; 12(5): 243
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article