Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry

REVIEW ARTICLES
Year
: 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 503--509

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the assessment of maxillofacial fractures: A meta-analysis


Srikanth Gadicherla1, Kalyana-Chakravarthy Pentapati2, Nasrullah Rustaqi3, Anupam Singh1, Komal Smriti4 
1 Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
2 Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dentistry Faculty of Kabul Medical University, Kabul, Afghanistan
4 Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Kalyana-Chakravarthy Pentapati
Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka.
India

Objective: To evaluate the pooled sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography (USG) in maxillofacial fractures. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was performed in five databases (PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source) from inception to September 12, 2020. Studies that reported or from which sensitivity and specificity can be calculated and studies published in the English language were included. Conference proceedings, letter to editors, and case reports were excluded. Screening of studies, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (QUADAS -2) were done separately by two review authors. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates. Results: After the removal of duplicates, 1852 studies were included for screening of title and abstracts. Only 22 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The sample size ranged from 6 to 87. The majority of the studies assessed orbit and nasal bones fractures. Only two studies included a comprehensive assessment of facial fractures. The overall sensitivity and specificity values were 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. Conclusion: USG has good diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of fractures of orbit and nasal bones. Clinicians need to consider the advantages and limitations of USG before recommending advanced imaging modalities.


How to cite this article:
Gadicherla S, Pentapati KC, Rustaqi N, Singh A, Smriti K. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the assessment of maxillofacial fractures: A meta-analysis.J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent 2021;11:503-509


How to cite this URL:
Gadicherla S, Pentapati KC, Rustaqi N, Singh A, Smriti K. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography for the assessment of maxillofacial fractures: A meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prevent Communit Dent [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 7 ];11:503-509
Available from: https://www.jispcd.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0762;year=2021;volume=11;issue=5;spage=503;epage=509;aulast=Gadicherla;type=0